DONATE NOW
  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Board of Directors
    • Meet the PROMO Staff
    • Current Openings
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Join PROMO’s Capitol Club
  • Events
  • News
    • Blog
  • Issues
  • Resources
  • Shop
  • Missourians Aging with Pride (MAP)

PROMO Commends Springfield City Council for Removal of Unconstitutional City Ordinance

By PROMO

September 9, 2009

Tweet
Pin
Share
0 Shares

The unconstitutional Solicitation Ordinance has been on the books since 1976 and recently came under fire by Council member Doug Burlison this past June at Greater Ozarks Pridefest. After the final reading at the Springfield City Council meeting last night, the council unanimously voted to repeal the ordinance along with the removal or amendment to four other chapters of outdated or noncompliant ordinances.

Steph Perkins, Southwest Missouri Regional Organizer for PROMO, said, “We are proud to see the swift action of the Springfield City Council on the unanimous removal of this ordinance. The council members have truly listened to their constituents and taken a stand with the constitution.” Perkins continued, “A special thank you from PROMO goes out to Council member Doug Burlison for bringing this ordinance to light and to the many people who contacted their council members to speak out against this unconstitutional ordinance. Their voices were certainly heard.”

PROMO initiated a letter writing campaign allowing proponents of the removal of the unconstitutional ordinance to voice their opinions to their Springfield City Council members. The campaign sent hundreds of letters from Springfield residents to the City Council members, allowing the residents to voice their opinions on the removal of the ordinance.

The ordinance states, “It shall be unlawful for any person in a public place to invite, entice, persuade or to address a person of the same sex for the purpose of inviting, enticing or persuading such person to commit sodomy. Sodomy means any sexual act involving the genitals of one person and the mouth, tongue, hand or anus of another person.” Although the ordinance has not been enforced in several years and is unconstitutional under the landmark case Lawrence v. Texas, it has been repeatedly overlooked by committees created to oversee the removal of outdated or noncompliant ordinances. However, with this vote, the Springfield City Council has shown the city that it stands with the constitution and its residents.

Related News

Elliot: The Importance of Celebrating Yourself

Elliot: The Importance of Celebrating Yourself A couple years after I started hormone replacement treatment and went to college, someone told me that, upon meeting…

Statement on the Respect for Marriage Act

PROMO APPLAUDS THE PASSAGE OF THE RESPECT FOR MARRIAGE ACT IN THE U.S. SENATE AND CALLS FOR URGENT PASSAGE IN CONGRESS The statewide organization applauds…

An End of Year Letter from Katy Erker-Lynch, PROMO’s Executive Director

Friends,If I’ve learned anything about PROMO’s donors over the past nine months, I know that you and I refuse to live in a Missouri where…

Statement on Colorado Springs Tragedy

A Statement by PROMO's Executive Director, Katy Erker-Lynch November 20 is Transgender Day of Remembrance, a day meant to honor the lives we’ve lost to…

  • Home
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • Board of Directors
    • Meet the PROMO Staff
    • Current Openings
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Join PROMO’s Capitol Club
  • Events
  • News
    • Blog
  • Issues
  • Resources
  • Shop
  • Missourians Aging with Pride (MAP)

© Copyright 2023 PROMO. All Rights Reserved.

Proud member of
Equality Federation